FAN vs. YCS
FAN (First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - FAN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAN returned 10.17%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for YCS. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAN charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
FAN vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAN achieves a 23.74% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FAN has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 10.17%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.63% annualized return.
FAN
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- 23.74%
- 6M
- 24.17%
- 1Y
- 44.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
FAN vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF | 23.74% | 40.38% | -8.96% | -3.20% | -13.12% | -11.63% | 61.16% | 31.22% | -11.40% | 16.30% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.78% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAN and YCS is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008 | 0.03 |
The correlation between FAN and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAN vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
FAN
YCS
FAN vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAN | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 3.79 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.49 | 11.86 | +1.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAN vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAN drawdown since its inception was -79.94%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAN and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAN | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.94% | -49.56% | -30.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -8.30% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.46% | -23.05% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -27.32% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.29% | -27.32% | -18.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | 0.00% | -6.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.08% | -19.88% | -25.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.65% | +0.64% |
Volatility
FAN vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.22%. This indicates that FAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAN | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 2.22% | +4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.70% | 12.19% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.26% | 16.96% | +3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 21.10% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 18.96% | +2.11% |
FAN vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAN has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAN vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
FAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF | 1.00% | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.50% | 1.79% | 0.84% | 2.42% | 2.67% | 2.59% | 6.04% | 2.35% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAN and YCS have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAN has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAN dropped -79.94% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.63% vs 10.17% for FAN. On fees, FAN is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FAN is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
FAN has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
FAN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. FAN tracks ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FAN and 1.00% for YCS.
FAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAN and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer