FAN vs. IBAT
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT).
FAN and IBAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FAN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2008. IBAT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials. It was launched on Mar 19, 2024. Both FAN and IBAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FAN vs. IBAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAN vs. IBAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF | 20.86% | 40.38% | -1.97% |
IBAT iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF | 18.93% | 32.09% | -13.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAN achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly higher than IBAT's 18.93% return.
FAN
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 29.13%
- 1Y
- 67.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
IBAT
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- 63.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAN vs. IBAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAN has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than IBAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAN vs. IBAT — Risk / Return Rank
FAN
IBAT
FAN vs. IBAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAN | IBAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.14 | 2.47 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.78 | 3.04 | +0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.41 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.05 | 4.62 | +1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.11 | 12.36 | +10.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAN | IBAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 2.47 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.73 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAN and IBAT is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FAN vs. IBAT - Dividend Comparison
FAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than IBAT's 0.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF | 1.03% | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.50% | 1.79% | 0.84% | 2.42% | 2.67% | 2.59% | 6.04% | 2.35% |
IBAT iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF | 0.97% | 1.15% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FAN vs. IBAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAN drawdown since its inception was -79.84%, which is greater than IBAT's maximum drawdown of -28.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAN and IBAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAN | IBAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.84% | -28.26% | -51.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -13.12% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.49% | +7.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.45% | -8.28% | -37.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 4.90% | -2.11% |
Volatility
FAN vs. IBAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) is 8.69%, while iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that FAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAN | IBAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 10.76% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 20.10% | -5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.50% | 25.78% | -4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 22.85% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 22.85% | -1.87% |