FAN vs. FRNW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FAN (First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF) and FRNW (Fidelity Clean Energy ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds. FAN is passively managed, while FRNW is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FAN returned 14.67%/yr vs 7.81%/yr for FRNW. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAN charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FRNW.

Performance

FAN vs. FRNW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FAN having a 20.47% return and FRNW slightly higher at 20.76%.

FAN

• 1D: -2.65%
• 1M: -5.81%
• YTD: 20.47%
• 6M: 20.15%
• 1Y: 38.86%
• 3Y*: 14.67%
• 5Y*: 4.21%
• 10Y*: 9.88%

FRNW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.48%
• YTD: 20.76%
• 6M: 19.11%
• 1Y: 63.79%
• 3Y*: 7.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAN vs. FRNW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF	20.47%	40.38%	-8.96%	-3.20%	-13.12%	-0.60%
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF	20.76%	53.20%	-21.11%	-19.64%	-11.46%	-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FAN and FRNW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021	0.83

The correlation between FAN and FRNW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAN vs. FRNW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FAN	FRNW
Utilities	55.7%	45.2%
Industrials	41.3%	28.3%
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	-
Energy	1.1%	20.5%
Basic Materials	0.3%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	5.7%

Return for Risk

FAN vs. FRNW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAN

FAN Risk / Return Rank: 63
FAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FAN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FAN Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FRNW

FRNW Risk / Return Rank: 76
FRNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FRNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FRNW Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FRNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FRNW Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAN vs. FRNW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAN	FRNW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.39	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	3.03	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.37	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	4.52	-1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.64	14.82	-3.18

FAN vs. FRNW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FRNW Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAN and FRNW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAN vs. FRNW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAN drawdown since its inception was -79.94%, which is greater than FRNW's maximum drawdown of -59.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAN and FRNW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAN	FRNW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.94%	-59.37%	-20.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.13%	-14.20%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.46%	-45.14%	+20.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.44%	-12.80%	+3.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.08%	-33.06%	-12.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	4.32%	-0.97%

Volatility

FAN vs. FRNW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) is 6.87%, while Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that FAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRNW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAN	FRNW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.87%	10.92%	-4.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.93%	19.84%	-3.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.41%	26.88%	-6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.42%	28.55%	-7.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.96%	28.55%	-7.59%

FAN vs. FRNW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAN has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FRNW's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAN vs. FRNW - Dividend Comparison

FAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FRNW's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF	1.03%	1.35%	1.52%	1.71%	1.50%	1.79%	0.84%	2.42%	2.67%	2.59%	6.04%	2.35%
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF	1.13%	1.25%	1.43%	1.30%	0.69%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAN and FRNW in my portfolio?

FAN and FRNW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAN or FRNW?

FRNW has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to FAN (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAN dropped -79.94% vs FRNW's -59.37%.

Which ETF is better, FAN or FRNW?

On 3-year performance, FAN leads with 14.67% vs 7.81% for FRNW. On fees, FRNW is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FAN has been the lower-risk option at 6.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAN or FRNW?

Over the 3-year period, FAN has performed better with a 14.67% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAN or FRNW?

FRNW is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAN or FRNW?

FRNW has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 1.03% for FAN.

What is the main difference between FAN and FRNW?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FAN and 0.39% for FRNW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRNW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.