PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAMRX vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAMRX vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMRX achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 8.62% return.


FAMRX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.24%
YTD
14.14%
6M
15.35%
1Y
31.11%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
11.74%

NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAMRX vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
14.14%20.87%12.60%18.98%-18.55%17.10%19.37%26.26%-12.61%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.62%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMRX and NTSX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.90

The correlation between FAMRX and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAMRX vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAMRX
FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAMRX vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAMRXNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.37

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

2.77

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

12.25

+2.77

FAMRX vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMRX and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAMRXNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.06

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.57

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.71

-0.28

Drawdowns

FAMRX vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMRX drawdown since its inception was -58.65%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMRX and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAMRXNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.65%

-31.34%

-27.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-9.16%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-16.82%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

-31.34%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.05%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-6.79%

-5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.07%

+0.03%

Volatility

FAMRX vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.39%. This indicates that FAMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAMRXNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.39%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

9.58%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

12.31%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

17.04%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.26%

18.27%

-3.01%

FAMRX vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAMRX vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

FAMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
4.87%5.56%3.44%1.33%5.07%3.15%1.99%5.52%5.62%2.31%0.28%4.83%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAMRX and NTSX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAMRX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to NTSX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMRX dropped -58.65% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

FAMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAMRX and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer