FAMRX vs. NTSX
FAMRX (Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund) and NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FAMRX returned 9.95%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for NTSX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAMRX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for NTSX.
Performance
FAMRX vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMRX achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 8.62% return.
FAMRX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 14.14%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 31.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
NTSX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
FAMRX vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund | 14.14% | 20.87% | 12.60% | 18.98% | -18.55% | 17.10% | 19.37% | 26.26% | -12.61% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 8.62% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 24.87% | 32.03% | -8.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMRX and NTSX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FAMRX and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAMRX vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMRX
NTSX
FAMRX vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAMRX | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.37 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 2.77 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 12.25 | +2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAMRX | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.06 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.57 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.71 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
FAMRX vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMRX drawdown since its inception was -58.65%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMRX and NTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMRX | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.65% | -31.34% | -27.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -9.16% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.35% | -16.82% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.00% | -31.34% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.05% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -6.79% | -5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.07% | +0.03% |
Volatility
FAMRX vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.39%. This indicates that FAMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAMRX | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 3.39% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 9.58% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.25% | 12.31% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 17.04% | -2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 18.27% | -3.01% |
FAMRX vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAMRX vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison
FAMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund | 4.87% | 5.56% | 3.44% | 1.33% | 5.07% | 3.15% | 1.99% | 5.52% | 5.62% | 2.31% | 0.28% | 4.83% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.08% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAMRX and NTSX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAMRX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to NTSX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMRX dropped -58.65% vs NTSX's -31.34%.
FAMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAMRX and NTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer