PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAMKX vs. JEMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAMKX vs. JEMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FAMKX having a 20.34% return and JEMSX slightly higher at 20.99%. Over the past 10 years, FAMKX has outperformed JEMSX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while JEMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.80% annualized return.


FAMKX

1D
4.16%
1M
-2.85%
6M
8.85%
YTD
20.34%
1Y
41.86%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
11.17%
ALL TIME*
9.02%

JEMSX

1D
4.24%
1M
-4.53%
6M
9.76%
YTD
20.99%
1Y
45.52%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
9.80%
ALL TIME*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FAMKX vs. JEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A
20.34%39.76%9.01%8.12%-20.09%-2.90%30.05%29.29%-18.32%46.52%
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
20.99%40.13%3.39%7.21%-25.77%-10.36%34.73%31.96%-16.02%42.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMKX and JEMSX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2004

0.93

The correlation between FAMKX and JEMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAMKX vs. JEMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAMKX
FAMKX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FAMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

JEMSX
JEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAMKX vs. JEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAMKXJEMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.90

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.76

10.28

-1.53

FAMKX vs. JEMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the JEMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMKX and JEMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAMKX vs. JEMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMKX drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, which is greater than JEMSX's maximum drawdown of -62.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMKX and JEMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAMKXJEMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.11%

-62.07%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-14.85%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.84%

-15.10%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.99%

-43.40%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.16%

-49.59%

+7.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.92%

-11.24%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.36%

-21.61%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

4.18%

+0.31%

Volatility

FAMKX vs. JEMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) is 9.09%, while JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that FAMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAMKXJEMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

10.61%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.31%

22.38%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

24.77%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

20.23%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

19.91%

-0.73%

FAMKX vs. JEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMKX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than JEMSX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAMKX vs. JEMSX - Dividend Comparison

FAMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than JEMSX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A
1.10%1.33%0.74%1.25%0.76%4.87%1.84%10.64%0.17%0.10%0.03%0.00%
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
1.04%1.26%1.41%1.45%0.37%3.80%0.09%0.76%0.87%0.39%0.66%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FAMKX and JEMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JEMSX has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to FAMKX (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMKX dropped -70.11% vs JEMSX's -62.07%.

FAMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAMKX and JEMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer