FAMKX vs. FEDTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M (FEDTX).
FAMKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 29, 2004. FEDTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011.
Performance
FAMKX vs. FEDTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAMKX vs. FEDTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 0.85% | 39.76% | 9.01% | 8.12% | -20.09% | -2.90% | 30.05% | 29.29% | -18.32% | 46.52% |
FEDTX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M | 3.99% | 31.19% | -4.16% | 20.12% | -12.35% | 6.05% | 16.31% | 18.91% | -19.40% | 36.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMKX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than FEDTX's 3.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMKX has outperformed FEDTX with an annualized return of 10.07%, while FEDTX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
FAMKX
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -13.15%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 32.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
FEDTX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 34.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAMKX vs. FEDTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMKX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FEDTX's 1.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAMKX vs. FEDTX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMKX
FEDTX
FAMKX vs. FEDTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M (FEDTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAMKX | FEDTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 2.35 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 2.95 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.45 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.12 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 12.26 | -4.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAMKX | FEDTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.35 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.51 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.58 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.48 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMKX and FEDTX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAMKX vs. FEDTX - Dividend Comparison
FAMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than FEDTX's 4.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 1.32% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.76% | 4.87% | 1.84% | 10.64% | 0.17% | 0.10% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
FEDTX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M | 4.14% | 4.31% | 3.30% | 1.63% | 1.10% | 11.36% | 0.05% | 0.48% | 0.87% | 1.51% | 0.95% | 0.22% |
Drawdowns
FAMKX vs. FEDTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMKX drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, which is greater than FEDTX's maximum drawdown of -43.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMKX and FEDTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMKX | FEDTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.11% | -43.70% | -26.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -9.94% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.76% | -27.91% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.16% | -43.70% | +1.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.73% | -9.62% | -4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -9.26% | -11.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 2.53% | +1.02% |
Volatility
FAMKX vs. FEDTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M (FEDTX) at 6.43%. This indicates that FAMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEDTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAMKX | FEDTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 6.43% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 9.71% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.40% | 14.32% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 13.96% | +4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 15.63% | +2.93% |