FAMKX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FAMKX (Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FAMKX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FAMKX returned 12.80%/yr vs 17.53%/yr for FCNTX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAMKX charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

FAMKX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMKX achieves a 31.56% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 8.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMKX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 12.80%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.53% annualized return.

FAMKX

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: 10.10%
• YTD: 31.56%
• 6M: 35.06%
• 1Y: 65.76%
• 3Y*: 28.12%
• 5Y*: 8.76%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

FCNTX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: 23.87%
• 3Y*: 27.27%
• 5Y*: 15.06%
• 10Y*: 17.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAMKX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A	31.56%	39.76%	9.01%	8.12%	-20.09%	-2.90%	30.05%	29.29%	-18.32%	46.52%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	8.62%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMKX and FCNTX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2004	0.67

The correlation between FAMKX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FAMKX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FAMKX	FCNTX
Technology	27.0%	27.0%
Financial Services	23.8%	13.8%
Industrials	12.3%	8.6%
Communication Services	9.2%	21.2%
Basic Materials	8.0%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	10.1%
Energy	6.0%	3.6%
Healthcare	3.7%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	3.7%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

FAMKX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAMKX

FAMKX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FAMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FAMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FAMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FAMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FAMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAMKX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAMKX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.75	1.77	+1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.66	2.46	+2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	1.32	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.93	2.20	+2.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.11	9.33	+10.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAMKX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMKX Sharpe Ratio is 3.75, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMKX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAMKX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.75	1.77	+1.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.79	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.89	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.78	-0.33

Drawdowns

FAMKX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMKX drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMKX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAMKX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.11%	-49.19%	-20.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.73%	-11.30%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.84%	-19.75%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.76%	-32.59%	-8.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.16%	-32.59%	-9.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	0.00%	-1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.45%	-8.16%	-12.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	2.65%	+0.71%

Volatility

FAMKX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) has a higher volatility of 8.18% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.30%. This indicates that FAMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAMKX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.18%	3.30%	+4.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.54%	10.47%	+5.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.07%	14.02%	+4.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.93%	19.15%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.82%	19.68%	-0.86%

FAMKX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMKX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAMKX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FAMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than FCNTX's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A	1.01%	1.33%	0.74%	1.25%	0.76%	4.87%	1.84%	10.64%	0.17%	0.10%	0.03%	0.00%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.30%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAMKX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

FAMKX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAMKX or FCNTX?

FAMKX has higher volatility (8.18%) compared to FCNTX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMKX dropped -70.11% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.