FAMFX vs. RFIMX
FAMFX (FAM Small Cap Fund) and RFIMX (Ranger Micro Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FAMFX returned 2.79%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for RFIMX. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FAMFX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for RFIMX.
Performance
FAMFX vs. RFIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMFX achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than RFIMX's 14.36% return.
FAMFX
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- -3.18%
- 3Y*
- 2.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
RFIMX
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FAMFX vs. RFIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | 2.21% | -11.60% | 12.43% | 20.10% | -12.42% | 27.72% | 10.10% | 26.89% | 1.49% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 14.36% | 1.99% | 11.52% | 9.14% | -24.26% | 30.58% | 44.44% | 24.94% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMFX and RFIMX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2018 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAMFX and RFIMX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAMFX vs. RFIMX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMFX
RFIMX
FAMFX vs. RFIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAMFX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.19 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 1.92 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 5.81 | -6.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAMFX vs. RFIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMFX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum RFIMX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMFX and RFIMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMFX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.66% | -99.41% | +59.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.49% | -11.07% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.71% | -99.41% | +70.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -99.41% | +70.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.95% | -99.14% | +82.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -30.73% | +24.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.17% | 3.65% | +8.52% |
Volatility
FAMFX vs. RFIMX - Volatility Comparison
FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) have volatilities of 6.60% and 6.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAMFX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 6.46% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 15.11% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.35% | 20.00% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 5,378.53% | -5,359.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 4,358.64% | -4,339.08% |
FAMFX vs. RFIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMFX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than RFIMX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAMFX vs. RFIMX - Dividend Comparison
FAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than RFIMX's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | 3.34% | 3.41% | 4.43% | 6.44% | 0.36% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 10.85% | 2.15% | 2.99% | 0.24% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 1.16% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 47.82% | 71.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAMFX and RFIMX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAMFX has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to RFIMX (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMFX dropped -39.66% vs RFIMX's -99.41%.
RFIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAMFX and RFIMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer