FAMEX vs. RSINX
FAMEX (FAM Dividend Focus Fund) and RSINX (Victory RS Investors Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAMEX returned 10.47%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for RSINX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAMEX charges 1.23%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for RSINX.
Performance
FAMEX vs. RSINX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMEX achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than RSINX's 9.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAMEX having a 10.47% annualized return and RSINX not far ahead at 10.52%.
FAMEX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- 6M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- -2.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
RSINX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
FAMEX vs. RSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMEX FAM Dividend Focus Fund | 3.03% | 1.91% | 7.56% | 19.70% | -13.40% | 25.61% | 13.19% | 32.56% | 0.06% | 12.64% |
RSINX Victory RS Investors Fund | 9.28% | 6.39% | 20.81% | 13.18% | -2.02% | 25.73% | -1.68% | 28.02% | -9.55% | 16.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMEX and RSINX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FAMEX and RSINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAMEX vs. RSINX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMEX
RSINX
FAMEX vs. RSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Dividend Focus Fund (FAMEX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAMEX | RSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.20 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 1.60 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 5.66 | -6.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAMEX vs. RSINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMEX drawdown since its inception was -54.68%, smaller than the maximum RSINX drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMEX and RSINX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMEX | RSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.68% | -66.11% | +11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.83% | -8.64% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -20.23% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -23.08% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.96% | -40.86% | +4.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.18% | 0.00% | -5.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -10.51% | +3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.84% | 2.44% | +4.40% |
Volatility
FAMEX vs. RSINX - Volatility Comparison
FAM Dividend Focus Fund (FAMEX) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) at 3.01%. This indicates that FAMEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAMEX | RSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 3.01% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.63% | 8.21% | +2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 11.98% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 19.03% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 19.04% | -1.13% |
FAMEX vs. RSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMEX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than RSINX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAMEX vs. RSINX - Dividend Comparison
FAMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than RSINX's 4.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMEX FAM Dividend Focus Fund | 3.64% | 3.74% | 3.34% | 0.67% | 1.36% | 1.36% | 2.18% | 2.97% | 1.35% | 0.70% | 8.80% | 5.19% |
RSINX Victory RS Investors Fund | 4.08% | 4.46% | 10.21% | 0.77% | 4.03% | 15.89% | 0.30% | 4.32% | 17.89% | 14.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAMEX and RSINX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAMEX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to RSINX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMEX dropped -54.68% vs RSINX's -66.11%.
RSINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAMEX and RSINX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer