FALN vs. DADS
FALN (iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. FALN is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FALN charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
FALN vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FALN achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 15.40% return.
FALN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 9.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
DADS
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FALN vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 1.78% | 3.99% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 15.40% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FALN and DADS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FALN vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
FALN
DADS
FALN vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FALN | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.01 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.91 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FALN | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.81 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
FALN vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FALN drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALN and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FALN | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.22% | -17.07% | -12.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -1.90% | +1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -7.66% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility
FALN vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FALN | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.54% | 17.59% | -13.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.31% | 17.59% | -10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 17.59% | -8.64% |
FALN vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FALN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FALN vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
FALN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than DADS's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.74% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 6.45% | 6.31% | 6.24% | 5.37% | 5.08% | 3.40% | 5.14% | 5.35% | 5.97% | 6.98% | 3.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FALN and DADS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FALN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FALN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
FALN has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 2.74% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FALN and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for FALN and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer