PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FALN vs. DADS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FALN vs. DADS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FALN achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 15.40% return.


FALN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.70%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*

DADS

1D
-0.98%
1M
6.05%
YTD
15.40%
6M
10.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FALN vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
1.78%3.99%
DADS
Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF
15.40%-3.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FALN and DADS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FALN vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FALN
FALN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DADS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FALN vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FALNDADSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.55

FALN vs. DADS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FALNDADSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.81

-0.06

Drawdowns

FALN vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FALN drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALN and DADS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FALNDADSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.22%

-17.07%

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-1.90%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-7.66%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

Volatility

FALN vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FALNDADSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.54%

17.59%

-13.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.31%

17.59%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.95%

17.59%

-8.64%

FALN vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FALN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FALN vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison

FALN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than DADS's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DADS
Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF
2.74%1.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
6.45%6.31%6.24%5.37%5.08%3.40%5.14%5.35%5.97%6.98%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FALN and DADS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FALN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FALN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.

FALN has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 2.74% for DADS.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FALN and 1.04% for DADS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FALN and DADS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer