PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAI vs. XAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAI vs. XAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FAI having a 32.45% return and XAIX slightly lower at 31.63%.


FAI

1D
4.39%
1M
5.49%
6M
34.12%
YTD
32.45%
1Y
48.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
41.61%

XAIX

1D
3.87%
1M
3.87%
6M
30.21%
YTD
31.63%
1Y
47.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
39.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.29M$2.80M$3.60M
$945.12K$1.44M$1.99M

FAI vs. XAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FAI and XAIX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.95

The correlation between FAI and XAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAI vs. XAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAI
FAI Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

XAIX
XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAI vs. XAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAIXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.82

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.64

8.44

-1.80

FAI vs. XAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the XAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAI and XAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAI vs. XAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAI drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than XAIX's maximum drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAI and XAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAIXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-23.95%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-16.95%

-1.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.92%

-7.32%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-4.01%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.26%

5.65%

+1.61%

Volatility

FAI vs. XAIX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a higher volatility of 10.83% compared to Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) at 9.40%. This indicates that FAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAIXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.83%

9.40%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.10%

23.32%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.50%

26.08%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.48%

25.22%

+6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.48%

25.22%

+6.26%

FAI vs. XAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XAIX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAI vs. XAIX - Dividend Comparison

FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FAI and XAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAI has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to XAIX (9.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAI dropped -27.82% vs XAIX's -23.95%.

On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 48.02% vs 47.53% for XAIX. On fees, XAIX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XAIX has been the lower-risk option at 9.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 48.02% return vs 47.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XAIX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.

XAIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.

FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FAI and 0.35% for XAIX.

XAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAI and XAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer