PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAI vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAI vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAI achieves a 22.25% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.


FAI

1D
-3.29%
1M
-6.04%
6M
20.67%
YTD
22.25%
1Y
40.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
1.13%
1M
1.49%
6M
35.86%
YTD
24.48%
1Y
64.61%
3Y*
-31.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAI vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FAI
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF
22.25%33.37%2.28%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
24.48%-1.76%-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FAI and BITI is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

-0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAI vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAI
FAI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAI vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAIBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.57

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

6.38

-0.19

FAI vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAI and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAI vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAI drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAI and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAIBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-92.16%

+64.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-25.28%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.16%

-86.41%

+73.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-68.40%

+62.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.53%

10.16%

-3.63%

Volatility

FAI vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) have volatilities of 10.93% and 10.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAIBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.93%

10.76%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.06%

34.28%

-10.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.44%

44.15%

-15.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.23%

52.24%

-21.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.23%

52.24%

-21.01%

FAI vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAI vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.62%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.62%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
FAI
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAI and BITI have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAI has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to BITI (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAI dropped -27.82% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.61% vs 40.32% for FAI. On fees, FAI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.61% return vs 40.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FAI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.

FAI is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FAI and 1.03% for BITI.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAI and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer