FAI vs. AGIQ
FAI (First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF) and AGIQ (SoFi Agentic AI ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - FAI tracks the Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index while AGIQ tracks the BITA US Agentic AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FAI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AGIQ.
Performance
FAI vs. AGIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAI achieves a 32.45% return, which is significantly higher than AGIQ's 11.81% return.
FAI
- 1D
- 4.39%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 34.12%
- YTD
- 32.45%
- 1Y
- 48.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 41.61%
AGIQ
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- 6M
- 14.48%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $100.24K | $102.18K | $184.78K | |
| $1.29M | $2.80M | $3.60M |
FAI vs. AGIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 32.45% | 13.07% |
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF | 11.81% | 13.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAI and AGIQ is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAI vs. AGIQ — Risk / Return Rank
FAI
AGIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FAI vs. AGIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAI | AGIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.64 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAI vs. AGIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAI drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than AGIQ's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAI and AGIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAI | AGIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -19.72% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -0.96% | -4.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -6.24% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.26% | — | — |
Volatility
FAI vs. AGIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAI | AGIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.50% | 24.07% | +5.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.48% | 24.07% | +7.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.48% | 24.07% | +7.41% |
FAI vs. AGIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AGIQ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAI vs. AGIQ - Dividend Comparison
FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF | 1.81% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAI and AGIQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FAI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FAI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AGIQ.
AGIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.
FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while AGIQ tracks BITA US Agentic AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FAI and 0.69% for AGIQ.
Find the right allocation for FAI and AGIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer