FAGKX vs. KMKNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX).
FAGKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. KMKNX is an actively managed fund by Kinetics. It was launched on Jan 31, 2006.
Performance
FAGKX vs. KMKNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGKX vs. KMKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGKX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K | -3.18% | 3.13% | 17.83% | 21.07% | -26.41% | 21.43% | 29.49% | 36.75% | -6.77% | 21.07% |
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 22.52% | -3.09% | 84.05% | -7.34% | 14.98% | 28.03% | 19.56% | 22.76% | -10.68% | 47.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAGKX achieves a -3.18% return, which is significantly lower than KMKNX's 22.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGKX has underperformed KMKNX with an annualized return of 10.08%, while KMKNX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.10% annualized return.
FAGKX
- 1D
- 4.36%
- 1M
- -8.29%
- YTD
- -3.18%
- 6M
- -14.14%
- 1Y
- 7.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.58%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
KMKNX
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- 22.52%
- 6M
- 11.44%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 32.40%
- 5Y*
- 15.19%
- 10Y*
- 21.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGKX vs. KMKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGKX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than KMKNX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGKX vs. KMKNX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGKX
KMKNX
FAGKX vs. KMKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGKX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.08 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 0.43 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 0.79 | +0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGKX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.58 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.90 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.58 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGKX and KMKNX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FAGKX vs. KMKNX - Dividend Comparison
FAGKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMKNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGKX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 13.99% | 8.30% | 3.73% | 0.90% | 0.05% | 0.72% | 0.29% |
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 1.56% | 0.26% | 0.33% | 9.13% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FAGKX vs. KMKNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGKX drawdown since its inception was -54.37%, smaller than the maximum KMKNX drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGKX and KMKNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGKX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.37% | -65.47% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.29% | -19.52% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.57% | -31.47% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.57% | -31.47% | -5.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.81% | -10.15% | -6.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -15.29% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.11% | 10.58% | -3.47% |
Volatility
FAGKX vs. KMKNX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) at 7.07%. This indicates that FAGKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMKNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGKX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | 7.07% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.44% | 17.87% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.86% | 24.61% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 26.44% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 23.39% | -1.38% |