FAGCX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FAGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FAGCX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGCX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | -9.48% | 22.47% | 39.06% | 45.51% | -32.60% | 16.63% | 74.20% | 47.51% | 19.08% | 37.70% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 0.95% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAGCX achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGCX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 22.70%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.97% annualized return.
FAGCX
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.70%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGCX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGCX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGCX
FSPSX
FAGCX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.39 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.90 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.94 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 7.43 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.39 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.53 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.55 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.47 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGCX and FSPSX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FAGCX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FAGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than FSPSX's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | 4.05% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.34% | 14.14% | 7.31% | 7.69% | 14.30% | 8.00% | 15.78% | 16.11% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.12% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FAGCX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGCX drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGCX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.09% | -33.69% | -35.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.10% | -11.39% | -4.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -29.41% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -33.69% | -5.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.10% | -8.22% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -6.60% | -12.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 2.97% | +1.49% |
Volatility
FAGCX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 7.65%. This indicates that FAGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 7.65% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 11.01% | +3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 17.00% | +7.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 15.82% | +9.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 16.49% | +7.93% |