FAGCX vs. EILGX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FAGCX (Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I) and EILGX (Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAGCX returned 25.36%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for EILGX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAGCX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for EILGX.

Performance

FAGCX vs. EILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAGCX achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than EILGX's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGCX has outperformed EILGX with an annualized return of 25.36%, while EILGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.83% annualized return.

FAGCX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.25%
• 6M: 13.74%
• YTD: 14.35%
• 1Y: 26.26%
• 3Y*: 28.11%
• 5Y*: 14.38%
• 10Y*: 25.36%

EILGX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 3.26%
• 6M: -8.09%
• YTD: -6.87%
• 1Y: -2.42%
• 3Y*: 7.52%
• 5Y*: 4.97%
• 10Y*: 13.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAGCX vs. EILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I	14.35%	22.47%	39.06%	45.51%	-32.60%	16.63%	74.20%	47.51%	19.08%	37.70%
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth	-6.87%	10.85%	10.63%	25.66%	-20.27%	30.41%	27.18%	38.37%	8.31%	27.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FAGCX and EILGX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2002	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FAGCX and EILGX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FAGCX vs. EILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAGCX

FAGCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
FAGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FAGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FAGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FAGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FAGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

EILGX

EILGX Risk / Return Rank: 2
EILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAGCX vs. EILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAGCX	EILGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	-0.16	+1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	-0.13	+1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.98	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	-0.14	+1.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.11	-0.28	+6.39

FAGCX vs. EILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAGCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the EILGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGCX and EILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAGCX vs. EILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAGCX drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, which is greater than EILGX's maximum drawdown of -51.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGCX and EILGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAGCX	EILGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.09%	-51.01%	-18.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.10%	-15.18%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.59%	-15.18%	-11.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.72%	-27.35%	-11.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.72%	-30.85%	-7.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	-8.92%	+6.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.69%	-7.14%	-11.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	7.39%	-2.97%

Volatility

FAGCX vs. EILGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that FAGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAGCX	EILGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.41%	5.38%	+3.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.91%	10.88%	+6.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.56%	13.16%	+7.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.75%	16.88%	+8.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.61%	17.93%	+6.68%

FAGCX vs. EILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EILGX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAGCX vs. EILGX - Dividend Comparison

FAGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than EILGX's 16.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth	16.52%	15.39%	4.34%	0.57%	0.32%	2.18%	0.62%	0.17%	19.72%	54.05%	17.75%	23.15%
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I	3.21%	3.67%	0.00%	0.00%	11.34%	14.14%	7.31%	7.69%	14.30%	8.00%	15.78%	16.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAGCX and EILGX in my portfolio?

FAGCX and EILGX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAGCX or EILGX?

FAGCX has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to EILGX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAGCX dropped -69.09% vs EILGX's -51.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.