PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAGAX vs. MRFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAGAX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAGAX achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than MRFOX's 4.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGAX has outperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 21.15%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.80% annualized return.


FAGAX

1D
2.85%
1M
-1.52%
6M
13.96%
YTD
11.64%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
27.23%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
21.15%
ALL TIME*
10.71%

MRFOX

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.42%
6M
4.23%
YTD
4.96%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
13.88%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
15.80%
ALL TIME*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FAGAX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAGAX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
11.64%22.17%38.71%45.14%-38.40%11.31%68.60%40.26%14.87%34.66%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
4.96%10.05%17.10%17.68%5.06%17.71%15.19%36.26%1.89%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FAGAX and MRFOX is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between FAGAX and MRFOX has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAGAX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAGAX
FAGAX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FAGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FAGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MRFOX
MRFOX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MRFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MRFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAGAX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAGAXMRFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.70

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.79

5.01

-0.22

FAGAX vs. MRFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the MRFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGAX and MRFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAGAX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAGAX drawdown since its inception was -65.24%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGAX and MRFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAGAXMRFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.24%

-29.10%

-36.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

-7.03%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-7.91%

-18.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.70%

-12.98%

-31.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.70%

-29.10%

-15.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-1.29%

-3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.14%

-2.34%

-12.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

2.39%

+2.35%

Volatility

FAGAX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) has a higher volatility of 8.38% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 4.18%. This indicates that FAGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAGAXMRFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

4.18%

+4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.01%

7.82%

+10.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.60%

10.40%

+11.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

12.17%

+13.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.12%

14.18%

+9.94%

FAGAX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAGAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAGAX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison

FAGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than MRFOX's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAGAX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
3.68%4.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.19%5.45%4.10%11.99%7.67%15.44%11.12%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.54%1.62%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.68%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAGAX and MRFOX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAGAX has higher volatility (8.38%) compared to MRFOX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAGAX dropped -65.24% vs MRFOX's -29.10%.

MRFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAGAX and MRFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer