FAFRX vs. RPIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A (FAFRX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX).
FAFRX is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 1, 2001. RPIFX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jan 30, 2008.
Performance
FAFRX vs. RPIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAFRX vs. RPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFRX Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A | -1.24% | 4.41% | 8.25% | 14.10% | -1.75% | 8.41% | -4.37% | 3.17% | 0.57% | 2.19% |
RPIFX T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund | -0.94% | 6.71% | 8.47% | 10.13% | -1.96% | 4.67% | 2.42% | 8.82% | 0.39% | 3.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAFRX achieves a -1.24% return, which is significantly lower than RPIFX's -0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FAFRX has underperformed RPIFX with an annualized return of 4.23%, while RPIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.79% annualized return.
FAFRX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 6.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- 4.23%
RPIFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAFRX vs. RPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAFRX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIFX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAFRX vs. RPIFX — Risk / Return Rank
FAFRX
RPIFX
FAFRX vs. RPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A (FAFRX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAFRX | RPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.85 | -0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 3.28 | -1.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.63 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 2.68 | -1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 10.39 | -5.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAFRX | RPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.85 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.77 | 1.85 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAFRX and RPIFX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FAFRX vs. RPIFX - Dividend Comparison
FAFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than RPIFX's 6.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFRX Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A | 7.17% | 7.76% | 9.17% | 7.43% | 5.59% | 3.47% | 4.52% | 5.38% | 4.92% | 3.55% | 4.33% | 4.84% |
RPIFX T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund | 6.63% | 7.22% | 7.77% | 6.53% | 4.12% | 3.94% | 4.29% | 5.12% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 4.31% | 4.45% |
Drawdowns
FAFRX vs. RPIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAFRX drawdown since its inception was -25.94%, roughly equal to the maximum RPIFX drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAFRX and RPIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAFRX | RPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.94% | -25.10% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.26% | -1.92% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.28% | -5.90% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.09% | -19.67% | +1.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -1.15% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -1.35% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.52% | +0.17% |
Volatility
FAFRX vs. RPIFX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A (FAFRX) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) at 0.71%. This indicates that FAFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAFRX | RPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 0.71% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.23% | 1.76% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 2.79% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 2.73% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.83% | 3.79% | +0.04% |