PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAFDX vs. PRISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAFDX vs. PRISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) and T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAFDX achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly higher than PRISX's -2.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FAFDX has underperformed PRISX with an annualized return of 13.26%, while PRISX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.48% annualized return.


FAFDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
-2.26%
6M
2.70%
1Y
8.87%
3Y*
23.09%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
13.26%

PRISX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
-2.60%
6M
2.62%
1Y
10.53%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
14.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAFDX vs. PRISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAFDX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A
-2.26%14.91%39.01%14.03%-8.93%32.90%-0.25%33.77%-16.09%20.17%
PRISX
T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund
-2.60%18.75%30.87%14.95%-10.99%37.83%5.65%32.84%-10.12%19.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FAFDX and PRISX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.97

The correlation between FAFDX and PRISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAFDX vs. PRISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAFDX
FAFDX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FAFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FAFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PRISX
PRISX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PRISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRISX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PRISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRISX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAFDX vs. PRISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) and T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAFDXPRISXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

0.69

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.85

1.01

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.13

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.77

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.94

2.18

-0.24

FAFDX vs. PRISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAFDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the PRISX Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAFDX and PRISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAFDXPRISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

0.69

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.51

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.67

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.43

-0.12

Drawdowns

FAFDX vs. PRISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAFDX drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than PRISX's maximum drawdown of -67.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAFDX and PRISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAFDXPRISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-67.34%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

-13.92%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-18.06%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-26.95%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

-42.86%

-3.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.20%

-5.66%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.66%

-11.25%

-6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

4.92%

-0.38%

Volatility

FAFDX vs. PRISX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX) at 3.23%. This indicates that FAFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAFDXPRISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.23%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

11.84%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

15.70%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

20.24%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.85%

21.86%

+1.99%

FAFDX vs. PRISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAFDX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than PRISX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAFDX vs. PRISX - Dividend Comparison

FAFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, which matches PRISX's 7.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAFDX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A
7.09%6.93%9.59%2.29%5.93%4.21%2.47%1.21%4.00%0.06%0.21%0.53%
PRISX
T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund
7.05%6.87%8.74%2.00%2.08%3.00%10.22%6.14%11.97%4.68%1.00%3.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FAFDX and PRISX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAFDX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to PRISX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAFDX dropped -75.69% vs PRISX's -67.34%.

PRISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAFDX and PRISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer