PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAFDX vs. FIKBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAFDX vs. FIKBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAFDX achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than FIKBX's 3.00% return.


FAFDX

1D
0.73%
1M
4.34%
YTD
2.79%
6M
1.20%
1Y
13.08%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
14.40%

FIKBX

1D
0.73%
1M
4.39%
YTD
3.00%
6M
1.41%
1Y
13.53%
3Y*
24.29%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAFDX vs. FIKBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FAFDX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A
2.79%14.91%39.01%14.03%-8.93%32.90%-0.25%33.77%-11.04%
FIKBX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z
3.00%15.36%32.80%14.47%-8.58%33.43%0.18%34.31%-11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FAFDX and FIKBX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

1.00

The correlation between FAFDX and FIKBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAFDX vs. FIKBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAFDX
FAFDX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FAFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FAFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKBX
FIKBX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FIKBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAFDX vs. FIKBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAFDXFIKBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.19

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.24

3.38

-0.14

FAFDX vs. FIKBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAFDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the FIKBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAFDX and FIKBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAFDX vs. FIKBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAFDX drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than FIKBX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAFDX and FIKBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAFDXFIKBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-45.95%

-29.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

-12.96%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-19.38%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-24.82%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.45%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.63%

-8.06%

-9.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

4.54%

+0.05%

Volatility

FAFDX vs. FIKBX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) have volatilities of 4.39% and 4.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAFDXFIKBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

4.38%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

12.20%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

16.09%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

20.69%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.88%

25.88%

-2.00%

FAFDX vs. FIKBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAFDX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKBX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAFDX vs. FIKBX - Dividend Comparison

FAFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, less than FIKBX's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAFDX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A
6.74%6.93%9.59%2.29%5.93%4.21%2.47%1.21%4.00%0.06%0.21%0.53%
FIKBX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z
6.91%7.11%5.04%2.48%6.20%4.43%2.78%1.59%4.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FAFDX and FIKBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAFDX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to FIKBX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAFDX dropped -75.69% vs FIKBX's -45.95%.

FIKBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAFDX and FIKBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer