FAFCX vs. FLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC).
FAFCX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003.
Performance
FAFCX vs. FLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAFCX vs. FLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFCX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C | -7.51% | 14.05% | 37.55% | 13.19% | -9.63% | 31.91% | -1.00% | 32.80% | -16.73% | 19.64% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -2.38% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAFCX achieves a -7.51% return, which is significantly lower than FLC's -2.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FAFCX has outperformed FLC with an annualized return of 12.13%, while FLC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.
FAFCX
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- -7.51%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
FLC
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- -2.38%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAFCX vs. FLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAFCX has a 1.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FLC's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAFCX vs. FLC — Risk / Return Rank
FAFCX
FLC
FAFCX vs. FLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAFCX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 0.65 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.52 | 0.87 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.16 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 0.85 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.46 | 3.23 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAFCX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 0.65 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | -0.03 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.25 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.28 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAFCX and FLC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FAFCX vs. FLC - Dividend Comparison
FAFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, which matches FLC's 7.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFCX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C | 7.21% | 6.67% | 9.04% | 1.58% | 5.50% | 3.78% | 1.85% | 0.45% | 3.33% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.28% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.28% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
Drawdowns
FAFCX vs. FLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAFCX drawdown since its inception was -76.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FLC drawdown of -76.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAFCX and FLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAFCX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.00% | -76.79% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.43% | -8.69% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.75% | -40.14% | +14.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.01% | -55.27% | +9.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | -5.76% | -4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.88% | -10.92% | -7.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 2.29% | +2.44% |
Volatility
FAFCX vs. FLC - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) at 4.46%. This indicates that FAFCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAFCX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 4.46% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 5.88% | +6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.23% | 11.39% | +9.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 14.24% | +6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.80% | 22.05% | +1.75% |