FADTX vs. CCOYX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX).

FADTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. CCOYX is an actively managed fund by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 23, 1983.

Performance

FADTX vs. CCOYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FADTX vs. CCOYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FADTX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A	0.00%	24.35%	35.02%	59.29%	-36.17%	27.26%	63.93%	50.57%	-8.52%	30.61%
CCOYX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class	0.25%	37.79%	27.11%	44.77%	-30.92%	39.45%	44.92%	54.68%	-7.78%	19.33%

Returns By Period

FADTX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOYX

• 1D: -2.98%
• 1M: -9.31%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 58.69%
• 3Y*: 29.72%
• 5Y*: 16.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FADTX vs. CCOYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FADTX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CCOYX's 0.82% expense ratio.

FADTX

Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A

CCOYX

Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class

Return for Risk

FADTX vs. CCOYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOYX

CCOYX Risk / Return Rank: 91
CCOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CCOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CCOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CCOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CCOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FADTX vs. CCOYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FADTX	CCOYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.82	—

Correlation

The correlation between FADTX and CCOYX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FADTX vs. CCOYX - Dividend Comparison

FADTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.13%, more than CCOYX's 8.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FADTX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A	11.13%	11.13%	8.01%	3.94%	3.72%	12.63%	7.85%	2.52%	23.98%	8.23%	1.63%	4.55%
CCOYX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class	8.06%	8.08%	12.32%	4.60%	8.17%	10.62%	9.52%	10.61%	11.42%	10.60%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FADTX	CCOYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-37.16%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-11.91%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.82%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.91%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FADTX	CCOYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	30.59%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	25.96%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	26.70%	—