FAD vs. IPO
FAD (First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and IPO (Renaissance IPO ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - FAD tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index while IPO tracks the Renaissance IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAD returned 14.94%/yr vs 12.04%/yr for IPO. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAD charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for IPO.
Performance
FAD vs. IPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAD achieves a 19.17% return, which is significantly lower than IPO's 25.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FAD has outperformed IPO with an annualized return of 14.94%, while IPO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.04% annualized return.
FAD
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 19.17%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 35.51%
- 3Y*
- 24.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.94%
IPO
- 1D
- -3.12%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 25.24%
- 6M
- 22.03%
- 1Y
- 32.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.83%
- 5Y*
- -2.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.04%
FAD vs. IPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAD First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 19.17% | 17.23% | 23.85% | 19.07% | -24.06% | 21.17% | 34.92% | 26.66% | -6.45% | 25.75% |
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 25.24% | 5.45% | 15.68% | 52.55% | -57.26% | -10.31% | 107.88% | 34.11% | -17.24% | 37.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAD and IPO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FAD and IPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
FAD vs. IPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAD
IPO
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Technology
FAD
IPO
Industrials
FAD
IPO
Healthcare
FAD
IPO
Consumer Cyclical
FAD
IPO
Financial Services
FAD
IPO
Real Estate
FAD
IPO
Communication Services
FAD
IPO
Basic Materials
FAD
IPO
-
Consumer Defensive
FAD
IPO
Utilities
FAD
IPO
Energy
FAD
IPO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAD vs. IPO — Risk / Return Rank
FAD
IPO
FAD vs. IPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAD | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.19 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 1.26 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.74 | 2.81 | +9.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAD vs. IPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAD drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, smaller than the maximum IPO drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAD and IPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAD | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.33% | -68.76% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -26.24% | +15.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.55% | -32.04% | +8.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.99% | -66.02% | +34.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.25% | -68.76% | +31.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -24.33% | +22.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -22.93% | +13.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 11.72% | -8.92% |
Volatility
FAD vs. IPO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) is 7.85%, while Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that FAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAD | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.85% | 11.32% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.44% | 23.79% | -8.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.65% | 30.30% | -10.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 36.08% | -15.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 31.61% | -10.32% |
FAD vs. IPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than IPO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAD vs. IPO - Dividend Comparison
FAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than IPO's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAD First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.59% | 0.51% | 0.60% | 0.09% | 0.32% | 0.48% | 0.20% | 0.22% | 0.64% | 0.41% |
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 0.42% | 0.66% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.49% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAD and IPO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPO has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to FAD (7.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAD dropped -54.33% vs IPO's -68.76%.
On 10-year performance, FAD leads with 14.94% vs 12.04% for IPO. On fees, IPO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FAD has been the lower-risk option at 7.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FAD has performed better with a 14.94% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IPO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FAD.
IPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.09% for FAD.
FAD tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index, while IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FAD and 0.60% for IPO.
FAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAD and IPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer