FACVX vs. PISHX
FACVX (Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A) and PISHX (Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FACVX returned 9.35%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for PISHX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FACVX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for PISHX.
Performance
FACVX vs. PISHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FACVX achieves a 25.26% return, which is significantly higher than PISHX's 2.00% return.
FACVX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 25.26%
- 6M
- 24.71%
- 1Y
- 44.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
PISHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 8.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- —
FACVX vs. PISHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A | 25.26% | 17.95% | 7.92% | 11.06% | -15.59% | 9.63% | 42.09% | 14.93% |
PISHX Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares | 2.00% | 9.65% | 12.50% | 7.91% | -11.73% | 4.30% | 8.57% | 12.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between FACVX and PISHX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2019 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FACVX vs. PISHX — Risk / Return Rank
FACVX
PISHX
FACVX vs. PISHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) and Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FACVX | PISHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.95 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.34 | 3.18 | +3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.84 | 14.50 | +10.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FACVX | PISHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06 | 3.74 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.91 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.82 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
FACVX vs. PISHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FACVX drawdown since its inception was -25.09%, smaller than the maximum PISHX drawdown of -27.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACVX and PISHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FACVX | PISHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.09% | -27.12% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -2.83% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.91% | -3.90% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.32% | -19.14% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -3.94% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 0.62% | +1.20% |
Volatility
FACVX vs. PISHX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX) at 0.72%. This indicates that FACVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PISHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FACVX | PISHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 0.72% | +4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.83% | 2.10% | +9.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 2.40% | +12.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 4.57% | +8.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 7.35% | +6.30% |
FACVX vs. PISHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FACVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than PISHX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FACVX vs. PISHX - Dividend Comparison
FACVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.64%, more than PISHX's 5.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A | 8.64% | 11.18% | 1.85% | 1.86% | 3.48% | 20.42% | 10.56% | 3.04% | 9.55% | 3.89% | 4.62% | 10.02% |
PISHX Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares | 5.62% | 5.52% | 5.89% | 5.92% | 5.45% | 4.25% | 4.59% | 3.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FACVX and PISHX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FACVX has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to PISHX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACVX dropped -25.09% vs PISHX's -27.12%.
PISHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 3.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FACVX and PISHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer