FACVX vs. PISHX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FACVX (Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A) and PISHX (Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares) are both mutual funds - FACVX is a Convertible Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while PISHX is a Preferred Stock fund managed by Cohen & Steers. Over the past 5 years, FACVX returned 6.86%/yr vs 3.75%/yr for PISHX. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FACVX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for PISHX.

Performance

FACVX vs. PISHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) and Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FACVX achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than PISHX's 1.85% return.

FACVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.58%
• 6M: 8.08%
• YTD: 13.96%
• 1Y: 25.05%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 11.64%
• ALL TIME*: 13.20%

PISHX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -0.96%
• 6M: 1.06%
• YTD: 1.85%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: 10.17%
• 5Y*: 3.75%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PISHX Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FACVX vs. PISHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A	13.96%	17.95%	7.92%	11.06%	-15.59%	9.63%	42.09%	15.51%
PISHX Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares	1.85%	9.65%	12.50%	7.91%	-11.73%	4.30%	8.57%	12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FACVX and PISHX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019	0.38

Return for Risk

FACVX vs. PISHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FACVX

FACVX Risk / Return Rank: 45
FACVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FACVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FACVX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FACVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FACVX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PISHX

PISHX Risk / Return Rank: 77
PISHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PISHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PISHX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PISHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PISHX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FACVX vs. PISHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) and Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FACVX	PISHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.28	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	3.39	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.52	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	1.98	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.71	8.85	-1.14

FACVX vs. PISHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the PISHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACVX and PISHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FACVX vs. PISHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACVX drawdown since its inception was -25.09%, smaller than the maximum PISHX drawdown of -27.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACVX and PISHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FACVX	PISHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.09%	-27.12%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-2.83%	-8.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.91%	-3.90%	-15.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.32%	-19.14%	-5.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.02%	-1.05%	-7.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.76%	-3.86%	-1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	0.63%	+2.40%

Volatility

FACVX vs. PISHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX) at 0.62%. This indicates that FACVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PISHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FACVX	PISHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	0.62%	+5.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.91%	2.12%	+11.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.97%	2.46%	+14.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.90%	4.58%	+9.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	7.28%	+6.58%

FACVX vs. PISHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than PISHX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FACVX vs. PISHX - Dividend Comparison

FACVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.01%, more than PISHX's 5.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A	9.01%	11.18%	1.85%	1.86%	3.48%	20.42%	10.56%	3.04%	9.55%	3.89%	4.62%	10.02%
PISHX Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares	5.17%	5.52%	5.89%	5.92%	5.45%	4.25%	4.59%	3.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FACVX and PISHX in my portfolio?

FACVX and PISHX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FACVX or PISHX?

FACVX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to PISHX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACVX dropped -25.09% vs PISHX's -27.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PISHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.