PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FACVX vs. FICVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FACVX vs. FICVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FACVX having a 25.26% return and FICVX slightly higher at 25.40%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FACVX having a 12.98% annualized return and FICVX not far ahead at 13.28%.


FACVX

1D
1.16%
1M
7.38%
YTD
25.26%
6M
24.71%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
12.98%

FICVX

1D
1.16%
1M
7.39%
YTD
25.40%
6M
24.89%
1Y
44.52%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
13.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FACVX vs. FICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FACVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A
25.26%17.95%7.92%11.06%-15.59%9.63%42.09%28.21%-1.59%8.77%
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
25.40%18.28%8.11%11.39%-15.38%9.93%42.46%28.58%-1.31%9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FACVX and FICVX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009

1.00

The correlation between FACVX and FICVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FACVX vs. FICVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FACVX
FACVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FACVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FACVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FICVX
FICVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FACVX vs. FICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FACVXFICVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.53

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.34

6.40

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.84

25.13

-0.29

FACVX vs. FICVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is comparable to the FICVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACVX and FICVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FACVXFICVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

3.08

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.72

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.98

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

1.03

-0.02

Drawdowns

FACVX vs. FICVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACVX drawdown since its inception was -25.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FICVX drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACVX and FICVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FACVXFICVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.09%

-25.06%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-7.14%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-18.88%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.32%

-24.20%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.09%

-25.06%

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

-5.63%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.82%

0.00%

Volatility

FACVX vs. FICVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FACVXFICVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

4.87%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.83%

11.86%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

14.84%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

13.48%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.65%

13.65%

0.00%

FACVX vs. FICVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FICVX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FACVX vs. FICVX - Dividend Comparison

FACVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.64%, less than FICVX's 8.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A
8.64%11.18%1.85%1.86%3.48%20.42%10.56%3.04%9.55%3.89%4.62%10.02%
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
8.81%11.38%2.02%2.12%3.73%20.65%10.73%3.28%9.85%4.09%4.90%10.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FACVX and FICVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FICVX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to FACVX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACVX dropped -25.09% vs FICVX's -25.06%.

FICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 3.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FACVX and FICVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer