PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCVIX vs. CMNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCVIX vs. CMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) and Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCVIX achieves a 26.89% return, which is significantly higher than CMNIX's 2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CCVIX has outperformed CMNIX with an annualized return of 12.38%, while CMNIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.80% annualized return.


CCVIX

1D
1.37%
1M
5.16%
YTD
26.89%
6M
24.44%
1Y
44.88%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
12.38%

CMNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
2.83%
6M
2.97%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
4.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCVIX vs. CMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCVIX
Calamos Convertible Fund
26.89%18.83%9.71%10.61%-21.23%5.13%48.51%19.18%0.38%14.04%
CMNIX
Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class
2.83%6.89%7.43%9.17%-4.26%5.02%5.36%6.72%1.79%4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CCVIX and CMNIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2000

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between CCVIX and CMNIX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCVIX vs. CMNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCVIX
CCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CMNIX
CMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCVIX vs. CMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) and Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCVIXCMNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.97

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.87

6.76

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.59

40.98

-19.39

CCVIX vs. CMNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the CMNIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCVIX and CMNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCVIX vs. CMNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCVIX drawdown since its inception was -36.56%, roughly equal to the maximum CMNIX drawdown of -35.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCVIX and CMNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCVIXCMNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.56%

-35.16%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-1.02%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-2.77%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.33%

-7.52%

-19.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.33%

-8.12%

-19.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-7.14%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

0.17%

+1.92%

Volatility

CCVIX vs. CMNIX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX) at 0.39%. This indicates that CCVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCVIXCMNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

0.39%

+5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

1.55%

+11.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

1.83%

+13.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.12%

3.47%

+9.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.99%

3.62%

+9.37%

CCVIX vs. CMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCVIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CMNIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCVIX vs. CMNIX - Dividend Comparison

CCVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than CMNIX's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCVIX
Calamos Convertible Fund
7.98%10.25%1.31%1.87%0.60%13.59%6.56%1.00%14.47%3.90%2.84%4.68%
CMNIX
Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class
1.69%1.63%2.00%5.90%1.02%0.46%0.90%1.57%5.02%2.60%2.97%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCVIX and CMNIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCVIX has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to CMNIX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCVIX dropped -36.56% vs CMNIX's -35.16%.

CMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCVIX and CMNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer