FACGX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
FACGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
FACGX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FACGX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACGX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C | -9.71% | 21.26% | 37.68% | 44.06% | -38.87% | 10.46% | 67.34% | 39.19% | 14.13% | -0.64% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.81% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FACGX having a -9.71% return and SWLGX slightly lower at -9.81%.
FACGX
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- -9.71%
- 6M
- -8.85%
- 1Y
- 21.80%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 18.32%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FACGX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FACGX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FACGX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
FACGX
SWLGX
FACGX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FACGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.83 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.35 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.17 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | 4.02 | +0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FACGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.83 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.58 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.70 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between FACGX and SWLGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FACGX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
FACGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than SWLGX's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACGX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C | 5.82% | 5.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 6.13% | 4.87% | 14.01% | 8.00% | 17.39% | 12.23% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FACGX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FACGX drawdown since its inception was -65.53%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACGX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FACGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.53% | -32.69% | -32.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.45% | -16.16% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.17% | -32.69% | -12.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.47% | -13.03% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -7.13% | -9.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 4.69% | -0.11% |
Volatility
FACGX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 6.73%. This indicates that FACGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FACGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 6.73% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 12.40% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 22.57% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 21.52% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 22.81% | +1.02% |