FACDX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FACDX (Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FACDX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FACDX returned 8.13%/yr vs 17.43%/yr for FCNTX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FACDX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

FACDX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FACDX achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FACDX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 8.13%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.

FACDX

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: -5.18%
• 6M: -6.28%
• 1Y: 14.19%
• 3Y*: 4.31%
• 5Y*: 1.75%
• 10Y*: 8.13%

FCNTX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: 26.93%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: 17.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FACDX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A	-5.18%	14.19%	3.97%	3.81%	-13.07%	11.25%	21.07%	27.89%	7.20%	24.09%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	7.76%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FACDX and FCNTX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 1996	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between FACDX and FCNTX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FACDX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FACDX	FCNTX
Healthcare	100.0%	9.2%
Basic Materials	-	2.1%
Communication Services	-	21.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.7%
Energy	-	3.6%
Financial Services	-	13.8%
Industrials	-	8.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	27.0%
Utilities	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

FACDX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FACDX

FACDX Risk / Return Rank: 11
FACDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FACDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FACDX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FACDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FACDX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FACDX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FACDX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.72	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	2.39	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.31	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	2.13	-1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.96	9.04	-6.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FACDX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACDX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FACDX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	1.72	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.79	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.89	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.78	-0.21

Drawdowns

FACDX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACDX drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACDX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FACDX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.55%	-49.19%	+4.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.43%	-11.30%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.49%	-19.75%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.35%	-32.59%	+3.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.35%	-32.59%	+3.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.14%	-0.53%	-8.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.35%	-8.16%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	2.65%	+2.28%

Volatility

FACDX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FACDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FACDX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	3.26%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	10.48%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.85%	14.03%	+1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.90%	19.15%	-1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.78%	19.68%	-0.90%

FACDX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACDX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FACDX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FACDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.01%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A	14.01%	13.28%	12.33%	0.00%	0.00%	6.24%	5.94%	0.32%	5.08%	0.00%	0.00%	6.66%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.33%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FACDX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

FACDX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FACDX or FCNTX?

FACDX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACDX dropped -44.55% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.