PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FACDX vs. FBTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FACDX vs. FBTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C (FBTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FACDX achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than FBTCX's -1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FACDX has underperformed FBTCX with an annualized return of 8.13%, while FBTCX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.99% annualized return.


FACDX

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
-6.28%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
8.13%

FBTCX

1D
-3.07%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
-1.15%
6M
-4.56%
1Y
43.21%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
8.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FACDX vs. FBTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
-5.18%14.19%3.97%3.81%-13.07%11.25%21.07%27.89%7.20%24.09%
FBTCX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C
-1.15%38.48%-2.00%9.86%-8.64%-3.72%31.17%24.82%-4.55%24.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FACDX and FBTCX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2000

0.83

The correlation between FACDX and FBTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FACDX vs. FBTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FACDX
FACDX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FACDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FACDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTCX
FBTCX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FBTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FACDX vs. FBTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C (FBTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FACDXFBTCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

2.04

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

2.81

-1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.33

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

4.97

-3.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.96

14.52

-11.56

FACDX vs. FBTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the FBTCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACDX and FBTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FACDXFBTCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

2.04

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.30

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.37

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.26

+0.30

Drawdowns

FACDX vs. FBTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACDX drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum FBTCX drawdown of -64.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACDX and FBTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FACDXFBTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-64.04%

+19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-9.04%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.49%

-37.26%

+19.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.35%

-37.26%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.35%

-39.37%

+10.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.14%

-9.04%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-23.08%

+13.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

3.09%

+1.84%

Volatility

FACDX vs. FBTCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) is 5.08%, while Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C (FBTCX) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that FACDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FACDXFBTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

7.10%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

16.73%

-4.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

22.12%

-6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

23.63%

-5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

24.49%

-5.71%

FACDX vs. FBTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACDX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTCX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FACDX vs. FBTCX - Dividend Comparison

FACDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.01%, more than FBTCX's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
14.01%13.28%12.33%0.00%0.00%6.24%5.94%0.32%5.08%0.00%0.00%6.66%
FBTCX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C
1.70%1.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.50%9.78%7.92%2.92%0.00%0.00%5.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FACDX and FBTCX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTCX has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to FACDX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACDX dropped -44.55% vs FBTCX's -64.04%.

FBTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FACDX and FBTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer