FABZX vs. QSPNX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FABZX (Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund) and QSPNX (AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 10 years, FABZX returned 4.35%/yr vs 7.07%/yr for QSPNX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. FABZX charges 1.95%/yr vs 6.14%/yr for QSPNX.

Performance

FABZX vs. QSPNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N (QSPNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FABZX achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than QSPNX's 11.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FABZX has underperformed QSPNX with an annualized return of 4.35%, while QSPNX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.07% annualized return.

FABZX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 5.22%
• 6M: 4.95%
• 1Y: 11.79%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 3.92%
• 10Y*: 4.35%

QSPNX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 11.49%
• 6M: 12.41%
• 1Y: 15.82%
• 3Y*: 18.83%
• 5Y*: 19.34%
• 10Y*: 7.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FABZX vs. QSPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FABZX Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund	5.22%	8.48%	11.60%	2.86%	-7.86%	2.85%	7.36%	7.42%	-2.18%	6.85%
QSPNX AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N	11.49%	14.35%	21.33%	12.14%	30.40%	24.63%	-22.17%	-8.35%	-12.60%	11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FABZX and QSPNX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	-0.04

The correlation between FABZX and QSPNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (5 years) to 0.01 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FABZX vs. QSPNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FABZX

FABZX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FABZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FABZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FABZX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FABZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FABZX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

QSPNX

QSPNX Risk / Return Rank: 43
QSPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
QSPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QSPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
QSPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QSPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FABZX vs. QSPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N (QSPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FABZX	QSPNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	1.59	+1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.54	2.39	+2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.27	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.94	3.06	+4.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.80	8.19	+18.61

FABZX vs. QSPNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FABZX Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the QSPNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FABZX and QSPNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FABZX vs. QSPNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FABZX drawdown since its inception was -11.03%, smaller than the maximum QSPNX drawdown of -41.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FABZX and QSPNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FABZX	QSPNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.03%	-41.79%	+30.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.49%	-5.05%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.50%	-9.31%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.03%	-17.17%	+6.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.03%	-41.79%	+30.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-2.06%	+1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.38%	-9.57%	+7.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	1.92%	-1.48%

Volatility

FABZX vs. QSPNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) is 1.22%, while AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N (QSPNX) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that FABZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSPNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FABZX	QSPNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	3.47%	-2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.09%	7.12%	-4.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.92%	9.75%	-5.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.90%	15.84%	-11.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.08%	12.83%	-8.75%

FABZX vs. QSPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FABZX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is lower than QSPNX's 6.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

FABZX vs. QSPNX - Dividend Comparison

FABZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than QSPNX's 2.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FABZX Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund	6.67%	7.02%	11.80%	0.70%	3.10%	4.90%	0.80%	0.90%	2.33%	1.56%	0.77%	1.89%
QSPNX AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N	2.14%	2.39%	6.80%	23.73%	22.62%	12.61%	0.00%	1.63%	0.51%	6.81%	1.75%	5.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FABZX and QSPNX in my portfolio?

FABZX and QSPNX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FABZX or QSPNX?

QSPNX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to FABZX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FABZX dropped -11.03% vs QSPNX's -41.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FABZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.