QSPNX vs. RYMQX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QSPNX (AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N) and RYMQX (Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 10 years, QSPNX returned 7.14%/yr vs 2.16%/yr for RYMQX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QSPNX charges 6.14%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for RYMQX.

Performance

QSPNX vs. RYMQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N (QSPNX) and Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSPNX achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly higher than RYMQX's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, QSPNX has outperformed RYMQX with an annualized return of 7.14%, while RYMQX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.16% annualized return.

QSPNX

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 6M: 13.38%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: 21.11%
• 5Y*: 18.94%
• 10Y*: 7.14%

RYMQX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 6M: 5.84%
• 1Y: 8.80%
• 3Y*: 1.65%
• 5Y*: 0.25%
• 10Y*: 2.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSPNX vs. RYMQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QSPNX AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N	12.78%	14.35%	21.33%	12.14%	30.40%	24.63%	-22.17%	-8.35%	-12.60%	11.74%
RYMQX Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund	4.99%	1.58%	-3.59%	4.26%	-3.47%	7.17%	7.40%	4.79%	-4.66%	3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between QSPNX and RYMQX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.23

Return for Risk

QSPNX vs. RYMQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSPNX

QSPNX Risk / Return Rank: 52
QSPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QSPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QSPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
QSPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
QSPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

RYMQX

RYMQX Risk / Return Rank: 66
RYMQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RYMQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
RYMQX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
RYMQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RYMQX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSPNX vs. RYMQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N (QSPNX) and Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QSPNX	RYMQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	2.17	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	3.27	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.43	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.68	4.02	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.73	13.74	-4.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QSPNX vs. RYMQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the RYMQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSPNX and RYMQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QSPNX	RYMQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95	2.17	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.20	0.04	+1.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.41	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.19	+0.41

Drawdowns

QSPNX vs. RYMQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSPNX drawdown since its inception was -41.79%, which is greater than RYMQX's maximum drawdown of -29.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPNX and RYMQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSPNX	RYMQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.79%	-29.13%	-12.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.05%	-2.22%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.31%	-13.98%	+4.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.17%	-13.98%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.79%	-13.98%	-27.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.56%	+2.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.61%	-8.89%	-0.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	0.65%	+1.26%

Volatility

QSPNX vs. RYMQX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N (QSPNX) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX) at 0.67%. This indicates that QSPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYMQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QSPNX	RYMQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	0.67%	+2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.24%	3.40%	+3.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.65%	4.11%	+5.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.86%	5.68%	+10.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.82%	5.29%	+7.53%

QSPNX vs. RYMQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSPNX has a 6.14% expense ratio, which is higher than RYMQX's 1.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

QSPNX vs. RYMQX - Dividend Comparison

QSPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than RYMQX's 9.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QSPNX AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund Class N	2.12%	2.39%	6.80%	23.73%	22.62%	12.61%	0.00%	1.63%	0.51%	6.81%	1.75%	5.68%
RYMQX Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund	9.65%	10.13%	2.89%	3.12%	1.67%	0.78%	1.03%	2.10%	0.16%	0.00%	0.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QSPNX and RYMQX in my portfolio?

QSPNX and RYMQX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QSPNX or RYMQX?

QSPNX has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to RYMQX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSPNX dropped -41.79% vs RYMQX's -29.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYMQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.