PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FABZX vs. BILPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FABZX vs. BILPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund (BILPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FABZX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than BILPX's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FABZX has underperformed BILPX with an annualized return of 4.36%, while BILPX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.96% annualized return.


FABZX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.47%
YTD
5.31%
6M
5.40%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
9.25%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
4.36%

BILPX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.35%
6M
2.29%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
4.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FABZX vs. BILPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FABZX
Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund
5.31%8.48%11.60%2.86%-7.86%2.85%7.36%7.42%-2.18%6.85%
BILPX
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund
1.35%8.43%4.37%5.38%0.01%1.95%6.30%7.29%5.47%7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FABZX and BILPX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2013

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between FABZX and BILPX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FABZX vs. BILPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FABZX
FABZX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FABZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FABZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FABZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FABZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FABZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BILPX
BILPX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BILPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BILPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FABZX vs. BILPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund (BILPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FABZXBILPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.36

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.07

3.52

+4.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.19

13.62

+14.58

FABZX vs. BILPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FABZX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the BILPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FABZX and BILPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FABZXBILPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

1.84

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.89

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

1.07

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.36

+0.63

Drawdowns

FABZX vs. BILPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FABZX drawdown since its inception was -11.03%, smaller than the maximum BILPX drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FABZX and BILPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FABZXBILPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-47.50%

+36.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-1.53%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.50%

-3.33%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.03%

-5.18%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.03%

-11.58%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.75%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-5.53%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.39%

+0.03%

Volatility

FABZX vs. BILPX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund (BILPX) at 0.82%. This indicates that FABZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FABZXBILPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.82%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

2.22%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

2.93%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

4.09%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.08%

4.64%

-0.56%

FABZX vs. BILPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FABZX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BILPX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

FABZX vs. BILPX - Dividend Comparison

FABZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than BILPX's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BILPX
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund
4.14%4.19%4.16%1.99%2.58%2.66%2.97%3.41%1.97%5.12%1.11%74.64%
FABZX
Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund
6.67%7.02%11.80%0.70%3.10%4.90%0.80%0.90%2.33%1.56%0.77%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


FABZX and BILPX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FABZX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to BILPX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FABZX dropped -11.03% vs BILPX's -47.50%.

FABZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FABZX and BILPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer