PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILPX vs. AEDNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BILPX vs. AEDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund (BILPX) and Water Island Event-Driven Fund (AEDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILPX achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than AEDNX's 1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, BILPX has outperformed AEDNX with an annualized return of 4.96%, while AEDNX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.21% annualized return.


BILPX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
1.35%
6M
2.19%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
4.96%

AEDNX

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
1.48%
6M
2.21%
1Y
6.96%
3Y*
6.68%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
4.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILPX vs. AEDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BILPX
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund
1.35%8.43%4.37%5.38%0.01%1.95%6.30%7.29%5.47%7.15%
AEDNX
Water Island Event-Driven Fund
1.48%8.67%2.26%5.90%-0.63%1.18%13.42%4.76%-0.15%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BILPX and AEDNX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2010

0.55

The correlation between BILPX and AEDNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILPX vs. AEDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILPX
BILPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BILPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BILPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

AEDNX
AEDNX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AEDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AEDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILPX vs. AEDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund (BILPX) and Water Island Event-Driven Fund (AEDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILPXAEDNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.67

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

5.09

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

17.86

-4.85

BILPX vs. AEDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the AEDNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILPX and AEDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILPXAEDNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.83

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.70

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

0.82

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.64

-0.27

Drawdowns

BILPX vs. AEDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILPX drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, which is greater than AEDNX's maximum drawdown of -13.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILPX and AEDNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILPXAEDNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.50%

-13.03%

-34.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.53%

-1.37%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.33%

-2.79%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.18%

-8.94%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.58%

-12.24%

+0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.92%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-2.71%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.39%

+0.01%

Volatility

BILPX vs. AEDNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund (BILPX) is 0.77%, while Water Island Event-Driven Fund (AEDNX) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that BILPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILPXAEDNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

0.95%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

2.13%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93%

2.47%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.09%

4.05%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

5.15%

-0.51%

BILPX vs. AEDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILPX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than AEDNX's 1.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

BILPX vs. AEDNX - Dividend Comparison

BILPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than AEDNX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEDNX
Water Island Event-Driven Fund
0.93%0.95%0.20%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.24%0.46%1.78%0.62%0.00%2.79%
BILPX
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund
4.14%4.19%4.16%1.99%2.58%2.66%2.97%3.41%1.97%5.12%1.11%74.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


BILPX and AEDNX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEDNX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to BILPX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILPX dropped -47.50% vs AEDNX's -13.03%.

AEDNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILPX and AEDNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer