FABZX vs. AHLIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FABZX (Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund) and AHLIX (American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5) are both mutual funds - FABZX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while AHLIX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by American Beacon. Over the past 10 years, FABZX returned 4.36%/yr vs 5.15%/yr for AHLIX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FABZX charges 1.95%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for AHLIX.

Performance

FABZX vs. AHLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FABZX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than AHLIX's 12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FABZX has underperformed AHLIX with an annualized return of 4.36%, while AHLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.15% annualized return.

FABZX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 5.31%
• 6M: 5.40%
• 1Y: 11.79%
• 3Y*: 9.25%
• 5Y*: 4.02%
• 10Y*: 4.36%

AHLIX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 3.26%
• YTD: 12.91%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 31.52%
• 3Y*: 5.08%
• 5Y*: 4.99%
• 10Y*: 5.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FABZX vs. AHLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FABZX Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund	5.31%	8.48%	11.60%	2.86%	-7.86%	2.85%	7.36%	7.42%	-2.18%	6.85%
AHLIX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5	12.91%	2.59%	2.07%	-3.85%	16.94%	5.09%	10.71%	0.44%	2.52%	5.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FABZX and AHLIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.18

Over the past year, FABZX and AHLIX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FABZX vs. AHLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FABZX

FABZX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FABZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FABZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FABZX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FABZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FABZX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

AHLIX

AHLIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
AHLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AHLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
AHLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AHLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AHLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FABZX vs. AHLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FABZX	AHLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.13	2.90	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.76	3.88	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.53	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.07	6.41	+1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.19	20.39	+7.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FABZX vs. AHLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FABZX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is comparable to the AHLIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FABZX and AHLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FABZX	AHLIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.13	2.90	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	0.52	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.07	0.55	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	0.47	+0.52

Drawdowns

FABZX vs. AHLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FABZX drawdown since its inception was -11.03%, smaller than the maximum AHLIX drawdown of -21.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FABZX and AHLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FABZX	AHLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.03%	-21.62%	+10.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.49%	-4.91%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.50%	-21.62%	+18.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.03%	-21.62%	+10.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.03%	-21.62%	+10.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.39%	-6.56%	+4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.42%	1.54%	-1.12%

Volatility

FABZX vs. AHLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) is 1.16%, while American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that FABZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AHLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FABZX	AHLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	2.38%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.98%	7.67%	-4.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.86%	10.88%	-7.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.88%	9.64%	-5.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.08%	9.48%	-5.40%

FABZX vs. AHLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FABZX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AHLIX's 1.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

FABZX vs. AHLIX - Dividend Comparison

FABZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, less than AHLIX's 7.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHLIX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5	7.31%	8.25%	0.55%	1.10%	17.63%	7.44%	5.33%	4.47%	1.83%	4.01%	0.00%	3.51%
FABZX Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund	6.67%	7.02%	11.80%	0.70%	3.10%	4.90%	0.80%	0.90%	2.33%	1.56%	0.77%	1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FABZX and AHLIX in my portfolio?

FABZX and AHLIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FABZX or AHLIX?

AHLIX has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to FABZX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FABZX dropped -11.03% vs AHLIX's -21.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FABZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.