FABLX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

FABLX (Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FABLX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FABLX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

FABLX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FABLX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FABLX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FSPGX

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -0.83%
• 6M: 1.62%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 1Y: 9.02%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: 11.63%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FABLX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FABLX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	14.56%	21.21%	-18.52%	17.88%	22.13%	23.76%	-4.42%	15.75%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.56%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FABLX and FSPGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.83

The correlation between FABLX and FSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FABLX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FABLX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 11
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FABLX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FABLX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FABLX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.86	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.10	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.58	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.80	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FABLX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.66%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.32%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-7.75%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.35%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FABLX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.11%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.75%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.57%	—

FABLX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FABLX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FABLX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FABLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FABLX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	3.87%	1.48%	5.38%	6.92%	4.31%	2.86%	7.72%	6.16%	1.64%	5.17%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.39%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FABLX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

FABLX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.