FABC vs. SMH
FABC (Fabric.AI, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 5 years, FABC returned -65.48%/yr vs 37.82%/yr for SMH. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FABC vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FABC achieves a 27.76% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 69.83% return.
FABC
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -44.80%
- YTD
- 27.76%
- 6M
- -3.10%
- 1Y
- -59.02%
- 3Y*
- -66.14%
- 5Y*
- -65.48%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 69.83%
- 6M
- 67.17%
- 1Y
- 121.32%
- 3Y*
- 59.95%
- 5Y*
- 37.82%
- 10Y*
- 37.67%
FABC vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FABC Fabric.AI, Inc. | 27.76% | -77.59% | -61.17% | -42.51% | -76.23% | -73.52% | 38.18% | -29.89% | -95.20% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 69.83% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -17.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FABC and SMH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FABC vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
FABC
SMH
FABC vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabric.AI, Inc. (FABC) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FABC | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.52 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 8.17 | -8.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 29.21 | -30.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FABC vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FABC drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FABC and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FABC | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -84.96% | -15.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.83% | -14.93% | -63.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.45% | -35.74% | -62.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.73% | -45.30% | -54.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -8.57% | -91.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.23% | -40.99% | -54.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.91% | 4.17% | +49.74% |
Volatility
FABC vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Fabric.AI, Inc. (FABC) has a higher volatility of 43.31% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 19.24%. This indicates that FABC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FABC | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.31% | 19.24% | +24.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 90.67% | 29.55% | +61.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 122.37% | 35.07% | +87.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.64% | 35.88% | +48.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 111.93% | 32.98% | +78.95% |
Dividends
FABC vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
FABC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FABC Fabric.AI, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FABC and SMH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FABC has higher volatility (43.31%) compared to SMH (19.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FABC dropped -99.99% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FABC and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer