FAAR vs. KEUA
FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) and KEUA (KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds. FAAR is actively managed, while KEUA is passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for KEUA.
Performance
FAAR vs. KEUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FAAR
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 23.52%
- 1Y
- 41.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
KEUA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR vs. KEUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 25.71% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | 10.15% | -2.54% |
KEUA KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF | -19.02% | 32.81% | -14.52% | -3.14% | -2.74% | 22.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAAR and KEUA is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAAR vs. KEUA — Risk / Return Rank
FAAR
KEUA
FAAR vs. KEUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KEUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAAR | KEUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.09 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.29 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.69 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAAR | KEUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FAAR vs. KEUA - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAAR | KEUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | — | — |
Volatility
FAAR vs. KEUA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAAR | KEUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.48% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.51% | — | — |
FAAR vs. KEUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KEUA's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAAR vs. KEUA - Dividend Comparison
FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than KEUA's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.15% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
KEUA KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF | 2.83% | 2.29% | 7.71% | 5.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAAR and KEUA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KEUA is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KEUA is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 2.83% for KEUA.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FAAR and 0.87% for KEUA.
Find the right allocation for FAAR and KEUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer