FAAR vs. FCBD
FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) and FCBD (Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust, while FCBD is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Frontier. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FAAR returned 41.39% vs 4.32% for FCBD. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. FAAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for FCBD.
Performance
FAAR vs. FCBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAAR achieves a 25.71% return, which is significantly higher than FCBD's 0.38% return.
FAAR
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 23.52%
- 1Y
- 41.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
FCBD
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR vs. FCBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 25.71% | 8.07% | 0.21% |
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF | 0.38% | 6.29% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAAR and FCBD is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAAR vs. FCBD — Risk / Return Rank
FAAR
FCBD
FAAR vs. FCBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAAR | FCBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.09 | 1.85 | +1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.29 | 2.76 | +1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.34 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.69 | 2.56 | +6.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.41 | 7.89 | +16.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAAR | FCBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.09 | 1.85 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.80 | -1.35 |
Drawdowns
FAAR vs. FCBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAAR drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than FCBD's maximum drawdown of -1.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAR and FCBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAAR | FCBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -1.64% | -16.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.85% | -1.64% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -0.82% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -0.35% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 0.53% | +1.20% |
Volatility
FAAR vs. FCBD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) at 0.87%. This indicates that FAAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAAR | FCBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | 0.87% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 1.74% | +7.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.48% | 2.35% | +11.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 2.60% | +10.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 2.60% | +8.91% |
FAAR vs. FCBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FCBD's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAAR vs. FCBD - Dividend Comparison
FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than FCBD's 4.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.15% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF | 4.22% | 4.34% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAAR and FCBD have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAAR has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to FCBD (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAAR dropped -18.03% vs FCBD's -1.64%.
On 1-year performance, FAAR leads with 41.39% vs 4.32% for FCBD. On fees, FCBD is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, FCBD has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 41.39% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCBD is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 4.22% for FCBD.
FAAR is categorized as Commodities, while FCBD is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FAAR and 0.90% for FCBD.
FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAAR and FCBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer