PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAAR vs. FCBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAAR vs. FCBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAAR achieves a 25.71% return, which is significantly higher than FCBD's 0.38% return.


FAAR

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
25.71%
6M
23.52%
1Y
41.39%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
5.17%

FCBD

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.60%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAAR vs. FCBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
25.71%8.07%0.21%
FCBD
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF
0.38%6.29%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FAAR and FCBD is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAAR vs. FCBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FCBD
FCBD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FCBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAAR vs. FCBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAARFCBDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.09

1.85

+1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.29

2.76

+1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.34

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.69

2.56

+6.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.41

7.89

+16.52

FAAR vs. FCBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the FCBD Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAAR and FCBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAARFCBDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

1.85

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.80

-1.35

Drawdowns

FAAR vs. FCBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAAR drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than FCBD's maximum drawdown of -1.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAR and FCBD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAARFCBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-1.64%

-16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.85%

-1.64%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-0.82%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-0.35%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

0.53%

+1.20%

Volatility

FAAR vs. FCBD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) at 0.87%. This indicates that FAAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAARFCBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

0.87%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

1.74%

+7.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

2.35%

+11.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

2.60%

+10.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.51%

2.60%

+8.91%

FAAR vs. FCBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FCBD's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAAR vs. FCBD - Dividend Comparison

FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than FCBD's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.15%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
FCBD
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF
4.22%4.34%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAAR and FCBD have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAAR has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to FCBD (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAAR dropped -18.03% vs FCBD's -1.64%.

On 1-year performance, FAAR leads with 41.39% vs 4.32% for FCBD. On fees, FCBD is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, FCBD has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 41.39% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCBD is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 4.22% for FCBD.

FAAR is categorized as Commodities, while FCBD is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FAAR and 0.90% for FCBD.

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAAR and FCBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer