PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAAR vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAAR vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAAR achieves a 25.73% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return. Over the past 10 years, FAAR has underperformed COMT with an annualized return of 5.17%, while COMT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.09% annualized return.


FAAR

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
25.73%
6M
23.17%
1Y
40.73%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
5.17%

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAAR vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
25.73%8.07%5.97%-5.63%10.15%12.34%8.60%-1.28%-9.17%5.00%
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
39.67%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%-18.66%10.81%-6.67%11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FAAR and COMT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2016

0.49

Over the past year, FAAR and COMT have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FAAR vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAAR
COMT

Financial Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FAAR
100.0%
COMT
100.0%

Basic Materials

FAAR

-

COMT

-

Communication Services

FAAR

-

COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

FAAR

-

COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

FAAR

-

COMT

-

Energy

FAAR

-

COMT

-

Healthcare

FAAR

-

COMT

-

Industrials

FAAR

-

COMT

-

Real Estate

FAAR

-

COMT

-

Technology

FAAR

-

COMT

-

Utilities

FAAR

-

COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAAR vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAAR vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAARCOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.40

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.44

5.95

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.64

14.11

+9.53

FAAR vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is higher than the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAAR and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAARCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

2.24

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.64

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.48

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.20

+0.24

Drawdowns

FAAR vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAAR drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAR and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAARCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-51.89%

+33.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.85%

-8.02%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

-13.31%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

-29.00%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

-39.22%

+21.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-4.82%

+3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-24.07%

+16.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

3.38%

-1.65%

Volatility

FAAR vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) is 2.44%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that FAAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAARCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

7.37%

-4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

18.80%

-9.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

21.29%

-7.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.02%

21.06%

-8.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.51%

18.89%

-7.38%

FAAR vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAAR vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than COMT's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.15%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAAR and COMT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to FAAR (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAAR dropped -18.03% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 10-year performance, COMT leads with 9.09% vs 5.17% for FAAR. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, FAAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, COMT has performed better with a 9.09% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 5.54% for COMT.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FAAR and 0.48% for COMT.

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAAR and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer