PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAAR vs. COMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FAAR vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FAAR vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
24.94%8.07%5.97%-5.63%10.15%12.34%8.60%-1.28%-9.17%2.82%
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
24.42%15.12%5.24%-7.75%14.56%26.34%-2.95%7.02%-11.41%4.98%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FAAR having a 24.94% return and COMB slightly lower at 24.42%.


FAAR

1D
-0.05%
1M
12.00%
YTD
24.94%
6M
21.95%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*

COMB

1D
0.02%
1M
11.58%
YTD
24.42%
6M
31.07%
1Y
31.68%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAAR vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FAAR vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

COMB
COMB Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAAR vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAARCOMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

1.85

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

2.44

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.57

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.95

9.81

-1.87

FAAR vs. COMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the COMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAAR and COMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAARCOMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

1.85

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.82

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.52

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between FAAR and COMB is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FAAR vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, more than COMB's 7.27% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.21%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
7.27%9.05%2.48%6.57%30.85%15.83%0.07%1.48%0.97%0.20%

Drawdowns

FAAR vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAAR drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAR and COMB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FAARCOMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-33.50%

+15.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-9.19%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

-26.63%

+8.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-12.25%

+4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

3.34%

+0.59%

Volatility

FAAR vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) is 5.66%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that FAAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FAARCOMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

7.51%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

13.80%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

17.18%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.00%

16.53%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.54%

15.05%

-3.51%