FAAR vs. AGGA
FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) and AGGA (Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust, while AGGA is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Astoria. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FAAR returned 20.01% vs 2.78% for AGGA. Their -0.26 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FAAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AGGA.
Performance
FAAR vs. AGGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAAR achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly higher than AGGA's 0.59% return.
FAAR
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 20.01%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 4.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.09%
AGGA
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 2.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $215.20K | $282.01K | $403.65K | |
| $1.39M | $1.09M | $1.71M |
FAAR vs. AGGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 14.32% | 12.86% |
AGGA Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF | 0.59% | 4.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAAR and AGGA is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAAR vs. AGGA — Risk / Return Rank
FAAR
AGGA
FAAR vs. AGGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAAR | AGGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.24 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 1.91 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 6.97 | -0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAAR vs. AGGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAAR drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than AGGA's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAR and AGGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAAR | AGGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -1.47% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -1.47% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.08% | -0.76% | -9.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -0.24% | -7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 0.40% | +2.95% |
Volatility
FAAR vs. AGGA - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) at 0.68%. This indicates that FAAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAAR | AGGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 0.68% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 1.81% | +7.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 2.15% | +10.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.89% | 2.25% | +9.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 2.25% | +9.30% |
FAAR vs. AGGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGA's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAAR vs. AGGA - Dividend Comparison
FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%, more than AGGA's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGA Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF | 4.24% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 10.01% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAAR and AGGA have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAAR has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to AGGA (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAAR dropped -18.03% vs AGGA's -1.47%.
On 1-year performance, FAAR leads with 20.01% vs 2.78% for AGGA. On fees, AGGA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AGGA has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 20.01% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGGA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 10.01%, compared with 4.24% for AGGA.
FAAR is categorized as Commodities, while AGGA is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FAAR and 0.55% for AGGA.
FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAAR and AGGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer