FAAA vs. RAAA
FAAA (Fidelity AAA CLO ETF) and RAAA (Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAAA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RAAA.
Performance
FAAA vs. RAAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FAAA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAAA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAA vs. RAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF | 1.50% |
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF | 1.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAAA and RAAA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAAA vs. RAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA) and Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAAA | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.41 | 3.76 | +1.66 |
Drawdowns
FAAA vs. RAAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAAA drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum RAAA drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAA and RAAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAAA | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -0.71% | +0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.07% | -0.06% | -0.01% |
Volatility
FAAA vs. RAAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAAA | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94% | 1.39% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.94% | 1.39% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.94% | 1.39% | -0.45% |
FAAA vs. RAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAAA vs. RAAA - Dividend Comparison
FAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than RAAA's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF | 1.32% | 0.00% |
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF | 4.79% | 2.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAAA and RAAA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAAA.
RAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 1.32% for FAAA.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Reckoner. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FAAA and 0.30% for RAAA.
Find the right allocation for FAAA and RAAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer