FAAA vs. LONZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FAAA (Fidelity AAA CLO ETF) and LONZ (PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Fidelity, while LONZ is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. FAAA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for LONZ.

Performance

FAAA vs. LONZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FAAA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LONZ

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.75%
• 6M: 1.09%
• 1Y: 5.24%
• 3Y*: 7.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAAA vs. LONZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF	1.75%
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FAAA and LONZ is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026	-0.11

Return for Risk

FAAA vs. LONZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAAA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LONZ

LONZ Risk / Return Rank: 72
LONZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
LONZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LONZ Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LONZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
LONZ Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAAA vs. LONZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAAA	LONZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.29	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.19	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.54	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.59	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.71	—

Drawdowns

FAAA vs. LONZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAAA drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum LONZ drawdown of -4.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAA and LONZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAAA	LONZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.55%	-4.19%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.28%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-0.47%	+0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FAAA	LONZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89%	2.30%	-1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.89%	3.21%	-2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.89%	3.21%	-2.32%

FAAA vs. LONZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LONZ's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAAA vs. LONZ - Dividend Comparison

FAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than LONZ's 8.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund	8.14%	6.60%	8.16%	8.29%	3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAAA and LONZ in my portfolio?

FAAA and LONZ have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FAAA or LONZ?

On fees, FAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAAA or LONZ?

FAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for LONZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAAA or LONZ?

LONZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.14%, compared with 1.31% for FAAA.

What is the main difference between FAAA and LONZ?

FAAA is categorized as CLO, while LONZ is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FAAA and 0.62% for LONZ.