FAAA vs. CLOO
FAAA (Fidelity AAA CLO ETF) and CLOO (NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAAA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CLOO.
Performance
FAAA vs. CLOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FAAA
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAA vs. CLOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF | 1.09% |
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAAA and CLOO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAAA vs. CLOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA) and NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAAA vs. CLOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAAA drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, which is greater than CLOO's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAA and CLOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAAA | CLOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -0.04% | -0.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.00% | -0.06% |
Volatility
FAAA vs. CLOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAAA | CLOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 0.48% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 0.48% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 0.48% | +0.36% |
FAAA vs. CLOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FAAA vs. CLOO - Dividend Comparison
FAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than CLOO's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 0.59% |
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF | 1.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAAA and CLOO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CLOO.
FAAA has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.59% for CLOO.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and New York Life Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FAAA and 0.25% for CLOO.
Find the right allocation for FAAA and CLOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer