EZU vs. SLV
EZU (iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EZU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZU returned 9.96%/yr vs 15.85%/yr for SLV. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EZU charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
EZU vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZU achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, EZU has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 9.96%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.85% annualized return.
EZU
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
SLV
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 27.97%
- 1Y
- 115.23%
- 3Y*
- 46.35%
- 5Y*
- 21.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.85%
EZU vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 8.17% | 40.00% | 2.23% | 23.44% | -17.25% | 13.92% | 7.62% | 23.27% | -16.76% | 27.89% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 5.54% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZU and SLV is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.30 |
EZU vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZU
SLV
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
EZU
SLV
-
Industrials
EZU
SLV
-
Technology
EZU
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
EZU
SLV
-
Utilities
EZU
SLV
-
Healthcare
EZU
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
EZU
SLV
-
Energy
EZU
SLV
-
Basic Materials
EZU
SLV
Communication Services
EZU
SLV
-
Real Estate
EZU
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZU vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
EZU
SLV
EZU vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZU | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.97 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 2.12 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.98 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 6.48 | -0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZU | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.97 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.50 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.25 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
EZU vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZU drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZU and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZU | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -76.28% | +10.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.06% | -42.45% | +29.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.02% | -42.45% | +27.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.11% | -42.45% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.37% | -42.81% | +1.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -35.62% | +35.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.24% | -44.67% | +25.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 19.53% | -15.93% |
Volatility
EZU vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) is 6.82%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.47%. This indicates that EZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZU | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 16.47% | -9.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.07% | 58.29% | -44.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 59.03% | -42.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 36.15% | -16.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 31.83% | -11.34% |
EZU vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZU vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
EZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 2.64% | 2.85% | 2.90% | 2.56% | 2.79% | 2.46% | 2.13% | 2.84% | 3.47% | 1.91% | 3.07% | 2.18% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZU and SLV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.47%) compared to EZU (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZU dropped -65.32% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.85% vs 9.96% for EZU. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EZU has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.85% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.
EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
EZU is categorized as Europe Equities, while SLV is Silver. EZU tracks MSCI EMU, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EZU and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZU and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer