EZU vs. IBIT
EZU (iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZU returned 19.95% vs -35.90% for IBIT. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EZU charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
EZU vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZU achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -23.36% return.
EZU
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
IBIT
- 1D
- -6.03%
- 1M
- -14.44%
- YTD
- -23.36%
- 6M
- -26.36%
- 1Y
- -35.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZU vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 8.17% | 40.00% | 4.16% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -23.36% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZU and IBIT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZU vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
EZU
IBIT
EZU vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | -0.83 | +2.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | -1.09 | +2.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.88 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | -0.73 | +2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | -1.27 | +7.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | -0.83 | +2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.32 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
EZU vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZU drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZU and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -49.36% | -15.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.06% | -49.36% | +36.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -46.63% | +46.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.24% | -15.96% | -3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 28.28% | -24.68% |
Volatility
EZU vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) is 6.82%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that EZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 9.76% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.07% | 34.85% | -20.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 43.65% | -26.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 50.20% | -30.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 50.20% | -29.71% |
EZU vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZU vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
EZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 2.64% | 2.85% | 2.90% | 2.56% | 2.79% | 2.46% | 2.13% | 2.84% | 3.47% | 1.91% | 3.07% | 2.18% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZU and IBIT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to EZU (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZU dropped -65.32% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, EZU leads with 19.95% vs -35.90% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EZU has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EZU has performed better with a 19.95% return vs -35.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.
EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
EZU is categorized as Europe Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. EZU tracks MSCI EMU, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EZU and 0.25% for IBIT.
EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZU and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer