PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZU vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZU vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZU achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -23.36% return.


EZU

1D
0.73%
1M
3.97%
YTD
8.17%
6M
11.21%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
9.96%

IBIT

1D
-6.03%
1M
-14.44%
YTD
-23.36%
6M
-26.36%
1Y
-35.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZU vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
8.17%40.00%4.16%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-23.36%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EZU and IBIT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZU vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZU
EZU Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZU vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZUIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

-0.83

+2.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

-1.09

+2.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.88

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

-0.73

+2.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.88

-1.27

+7.16

EZU vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZU and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZUIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

-0.83

+2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.32

-0.11

Drawdowns

EZU vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZU drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZU and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZUIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.32%

-49.36%

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-49.36%

+36.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-46.63%

+46.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.24%

-15.96%

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

28.28%

-24.68%

Volatility

EZU vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) is 6.82%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that EZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZUIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

9.76%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

34.85%

-20.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.89%

43.65%

-26.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

50.20%

-30.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

50.20%

-29.71%

EZU vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZU vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

EZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.64%2.85%2.90%2.56%2.79%2.46%2.13%2.84%3.47%1.91%3.07%2.18%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZU and IBIT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to EZU (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZU dropped -65.32% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, EZU leads with 19.95% vs -35.90% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EZU has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EZU has performed better with a 19.95% return vs -35.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.

EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

EZU is categorized as Europe Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. EZU tracks MSCI EMU, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EZU and 0.25% for IBIT.

EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZU and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer