PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZU vs. DAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZU vs. DAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZU achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than DAX's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EZU has outperformed DAX with an annualized return of 9.96%, while DAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.


EZU

1D
0.73%
1M
3.97%
YTD
8.17%
6M
11.21%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
9.96%

DAX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.93%
YTD
0.89%
6M
5.11%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZU vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
8.17%40.00%2.23%23.44%-17.25%13.92%7.62%23.27%-16.76%27.89%
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
0.89%39.00%10.55%23.62%-18.47%7.73%12.27%22.11%-22.92%28.23%

Correlation

The correlation between EZU and DAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2014

0.89

The correlation between EZU and DAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

EZU vs. DAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EZU
DAX

Financial Services

24.2%
21.0%

Industrials

21.3%
34.8%

Technology

14.6%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
7.0%

Utilities

6.8%
5.0%

Healthcare

5.8%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
0.9%

Energy

4.2%

-

Basic Materials

4.1%
5.3%

Communication Services

4.1%
6.1%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.0%

Financial Services

EZU
24.2%
DAX
21.0%

Industrials

EZU
21.3%
DAX
34.8%

Technology

EZU
14.6%
DAX
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EZU
8.3%
DAX
7.0%

Utilities

EZU
6.8%
DAX
5.0%

Healthcare

EZU
5.8%
DAX
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

EZU
5.6%
DAX
0.9%

Energy

EZU
4.2%
DAX

-

Basic Materials

EZU
4.1%
DAX
5.3%

Communication Services

EZU
4.1%
DAX
6.1%

Real Estate

EZU
1.0%
DAX
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZU vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZU
EZU Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DAX
DAX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZU vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZUDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

0.28

+0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

0.52

+1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.06

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

0.40

+1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.88

1.27

+4.61

EZU vs. DAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the DAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZU and DAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZUDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.28

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.40

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.43

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.36

-0.15

Drawdowns

EZU vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZU drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than DAX's maximum drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZU and DAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZUDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.32%

-45.58%

-19.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-14.82%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.02%

-16.03%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.11%

-39.96%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.37%

-45.58%

+4.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.15%

+3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.24%

-10.51%

-8.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

4.67%

-1.07%

Volatility

EZU vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) at 6.20%. This indicates that EZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZUDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

6.20%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

14.34%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.89%

17.62%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

20.37%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

21.28%

-0.79%

EZU vs. DAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than DAX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZU vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison

EZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than DAX's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
1.46%1.47%2.24%2.48%2.80%2.65%2.25%2.47%3.33%1.73%1.78%1.41%
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.64%2.85%2.90%2.56%2.79%2.46%2.13%2.84%3.47%1.91%3.07%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EZU and DAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EZU has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to DAX (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZU dropped -65.32% vs DAX's -45.58%.

On 10-year performance, EZU leads with 9.96% vs 9.14% for DAX. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DAX has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EZU has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.

EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 1.46% for DAX.

EZU tracks MSCI EMU, while DAX tracks DAX Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EZU and 0.20% for DAX.

EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZU and DAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer