EZPZ vs. SETH

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price while SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -45.45% vs 26.49% for SETH. Their -0.91 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.

Performance

EZPZ vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -28.79% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 26.20% return.

EZPZ

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: -13.59%
• YTD: -28.79%
• 1Y: -45.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.43%

SETH

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -7.29%
• 6M: -3.53%
• YTD: 26.20%
• 1Y: 26.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -31.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	$92.79K	$145.26K	$218.28K
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	$1.00M	$1.08M	$1.82M

EZPZ vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-28.79%	-10.11%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	26.20%	-38.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EZPZ and SETH is -0.94, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.91

The correlation between EZPZ and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EZPZ vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

SETH

SETH Risk / Return Rank: 22
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 23
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EZPZ vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZPZ	SETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	0.40	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.40	0.99	-2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.12	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	0.91	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	1.60	-2.81

EZPZ vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZPZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZPZ and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZPZ vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -56.63%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and SETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZPZ	SETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.63%	-80.74%	+24.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.63%	-29.18%	-27.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.98%	-65.33%	+13.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.36%	-55.14%	+29.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.54%	17.35%	+20.19%

Volatility

EZPZ vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) is 8.25%, while ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a volatility of 11.51%. This indicates that EZPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZPZ	SETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.25%	11.51%	-3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.13%	43.93%	-8.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.70%	66.80%	-19.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.78%	68.75%	-21.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.78%	68.75%	-21.97%

EZPZ vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZPZ vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	22.68%	7.01%	3.44%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZPZ and SETH in my portfolio?

EZPZ and SETH have a correlation of -0.94, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZPZ or SETH?

SETH has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to EZPZ (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -56.63% vs SETH's -80.74%.

Which ETF is better, EZPZ or SETH?

On 1-year performance, SETH leads with 26.49% vs -45.45% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZPZ or SETH?

Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a 26.49% return vs -45.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZPZ or SETH?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZPZ or SETH?

SETH has the higher dividend yield at 22.68%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between EZPZ and SETH?

EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.95% for SETH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.