EZPZ vs. NEHI
EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and NEHI (NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZPZ is passively managed, while NEHI is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for NEHI.
Performance
EZPZ vs. NEHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly higher than NEHI's -43.71% return.
EZPZ
- 1D
- -6.18%
- 1M
- -26.82%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEHI
- 1D
- -10.96%
- 1M
- -30.98%
- YTD
- -43.71%
- 6M
- -43.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ vs. NEHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -34.43% | -7.65% |
NEHI NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF | -43.71% | -3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPZ and NEHI is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. NEHI — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
NEHI
EZPZ vs. NEHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZPZ | NEHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZPZ | NEHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | -1.20 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. NEHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than NEHI's maximum drawdown of -49.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and NEHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | NEHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -49.66% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.78% | -49.66% | -6.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.92% | -25.43% | +3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.82% | — | — |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. NEHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | NEHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 58.91% | -11.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 58.91% | -11.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 58.91% | -11.05% |
EZPZ vs. NEHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NEHI's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. NEHI - Dividend Comparison
EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEHI NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF | 27.76% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, EZPZ and NEHI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for NEHI.
NEHI has the higher dividend yield at 27.76%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.98% for NEHI.
Find the right allocation for EZPZ and NEHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer