EZPZ vs. CBOO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - EZPZ is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. EZPZ is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.

Performance

EZPZ vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's -0.10% return.

EZPZ

• 1D: -6.18%
• 1M: -26.82%
• YTD: -34.43%
• 6M: -36.79%
• 1Y: -42.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBOO

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: -0.10%
• 6M: -0.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZPZ vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-34.43%	-30.18%
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	-0.10%	-1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between EZPZ and CBOO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

EZPZ vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZPZ vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZPZ	CBOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.25	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZPZ	CBOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	-1.22	+0.51

Drawdowns

EZPZ vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and CBOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZPZ	CBOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.78%	-2.34%	-53.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.78%	-1.77%	-54.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.92%	-1.61%	-20.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EZPZ	CBOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.23%	2.13%	+45.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.86%	2.13%	+45.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.86%	2.13%	+45.73%

EZPZ vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZPZ vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison

EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	0.57%	0.57%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZPZ and CBOO in my portfolio?

EZPZ and CBOO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EZPZ or CBOO?

On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZPZ or CBOO?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZPZ or CBOO?

CBOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between EZPZ and CBOO?

EZPZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.69% for CBOO.